SAMEFAG
[QUOTE=Yenairo;60679]Those two guys are the same.[/QUOTE]
I read the BF3 Game Informer article. Fucking. Awesome. I can’t wait.
I am the chopper destroyer. I destroy choppers with my AT4. And tanks too. And snipers I guess. I love my AT4.
[QUOTE=Nalin;62016]I am the chopper destroyer. I destroy choppers with my AT4. And tanks too. And snipers I guess. I love my AT4.[/QUOTE]
Do you use the tracer dart before hand? Or just blind fire?
I kill choppers with a tank from 200m off coz im just that good >.>
[QUOTE=tricxta;62045]I kill choppers with a tank from 200m off coz im just that good >.>[/QUOTE]
bulls dont shit
Bahahaha. YES! XD
[QUOTE=Nalin;60778]I read the BF3 Game Informer article. Fucking. Awesome. I can’t wait.[/QUOTE]
Why? I bet their just going to pull another Call of Duty.
Every Call of Duty since 4 has been the same game.
Every Battlefield game is the same (including Medal of Honor).
I played Battlefield 1943, thought it was good, then played BC2, same game in many forms, played MoH same as BC2. Wtf? 
But Medal of Honor has good music.
[QUOTE=Dangerless;62202]
Why? I bet their just going to pull another Call of Duty.
Every Call of Duty since 4 has been the same game.
Every Battlefield game is the same (including Medal of Honor).
I played Battlefield 1943, thought it was good, then played BC2, same game in many forms, played MoH same as BC2. Wtf?
[/QUOTE]
Actually, I’ve been playing Battlefield since 1942 originally came out. Yes, the style of the game has been largely the same, but you can’t deny the way it presents itself. Battlefield:Vietnam was a much all around better game than 1942, and Battlefield 2 honed the series even more. As long as each progressive game tightens and enhances the series, as Battlefield has done, then I’m alright with it. I’ve lost faith in the MOH and COD online modes. But Battlefield has constantly been great with its online variety. Fly a helicopter, drive a tank, or anything in between. Open warfare at its finest, especially with environmental destruction.
[QUOTE=-Ghost-;62244]Actually, I’ve been playing Battlefield since 1942 originally came out. Yes, the style of the game has been largely the same, but you can’t deny the way it presents itself. Battlefield:Vietnam was a much all around better game than 1942, and Battlefield 2 honed the series even more. As long as each progressive game tightens and enhances the series, as Battlefield has done, then I’m alright with it. I’ve lost faith in the MOH and COD online modes. But Battlefield has constantly been great with its online variety. Fly a helicopter, drive a tank, or anything in between. Open warfare at its finest, especially with environmental destruction.[/QUOTE]
Main reason why I ‘dislike’ most of these shooters nowadays.
I do however like how Borderlands works, not because of it’s RPG system but the general layout of gameplay. It could very well end up being a promising game in the future. 
[QUOTE=Dangerless;62247]
Main reason why I ‘dislike’ most of these shooters nowadays.
I do however like how Borderlands works, not because of it’s RPG system but the general layout of gameplay. It could very well end up being a promising game in the future.
[/QUOTE]
I liked Borderlands as well. I also loved Fallout New Vegas. I’m just a fan of open-ended world games.
[QUOTE=-Ghost-;62041]Do you use the tracer dart before hand? Or just blind fire?[/QUOTE]
The AT4 is the manually controlled rocket. It follows your view and can’t lock onto tracers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2cFOx5NCWk
Also, BF3 is going to be awesome because it takes the environment destruction from BC2 to new heights. It is going to be amazing.
The video “somewhat” reminds me when I’d lock onto someone in Mech Warrior 3 and then fire a few LRMs to arc over a hill or around a mountain. And I do say somewhat, primarily since that is working without a tracer 
I think I remember playing one game with a guided rocket like that but I record what it was.
[QUOTE=-Ghost-;62244]Actually, I’ve been playing Battlefield since 1942 originally came out. Yes, the style of the game has been largely the same, but you can’t deny the way it presents itself. Battlefield:Vietnam was a much all around better game than 1942, and Battlefield 2 honed the series even more. As long as each progressive game tightens and enhances the series, as Battlefield has done, then I’m alright with it. I’ve lost faith in the MOH and COD online modes. But Battlefield has constantly been great with its online variety. Fly a helicopter, drive a tank, or anything in between. Open warfare at its finest, especially with environmental destruction.[/QUOTE]
You mean camp in a tree as a recon and snipe people? WOOKIES MAN!
Fucking wookies. They are so useless. All they do is sit around being useless with their amazing 2 kills and 20 deaths. The only time I ever worry about them is when there are 4 of them on a hill all shooting at me because it is fucking annoying and, because they are all on that stupid hill, their team is going to get curbstomped back to their base and the match will turn boring because it takes forever for the other team’s tickets to bleed out as nobody cares to spawn into the baserape.
[QUOTE=Nalin;62321]Fucking wookies. They are so useless. All they do is sit around being useless with their amazing 2 kills and 20 deaths. The only time I ever worry about them is when there are 4 of them on a hill all shooting at me because it is fucking annoying and, because they are all on that stupid hill, their team is going to get curbstomped back to their base and the match will turn boring because it takes forever for the other team’s tickets to bleed out as nobody cares to spawn into the baserape.[/QUOTE]
meet the new 4th reich leader